Tuesday, October 9, 2012

TRUTH ABOUT REPUBLICANS SURVEY RESPONSE



William L. Pressgrove
7849 W. 1700 S.
Cedar City, Utah 84720-4845
October 7, 2012
To reply to this survey, it is impossible to answer the questions solely with the responses provided.  This survey is just as lopsided in its presentation of reality as that of any of the Democratic positions.  I, therefore, choose to answer with this letter.  However, because there is no donation attached, I suppose that this will be trashed without being read.  I assure you, that many of my Republican friends will read it and that its impact will be felt.

To present the demographics; I am 63, married, self-employed (not an option on the survey), own my own home, and have a Masters of Education Degree.

1.      Do you believe that President Obama’s policies over the past three years have strengthened the U.S. economy?
a.       No.  President Obama, in my opinion, has been deliberately undermining the economy because, as a “New World Order” philosopher, he has to equalize the U.S. with all the third world countries.
b.      On the other hand, this philosophy has been the driving force behind both parties for the past eight decades.  Republicans in all branches of the government, although more slowly, have been advancing the socialistic programs that take away the freedom of choice from the citizens and sovereign of this country.

2.      The White House and its Democratic allies in Congress want to increase tax rates on individuals and families to pay for government that is more wasteful.  Do you support Democrats’ call for tax hikes?
a.       No.  The Democrats have stealthily added to the burden of all by their unilateral implementation of “ObamaCare”, in addition to QE1, QE2, and QE3 that diminishes the buying power of the dollars they still have left because of inflation.
b.      However, when the records of the Republicans as well as the Democrats are examined, there are only a handful of Republicans that have not added to the debt with pork barrel spending through the unconstitutional practice of earmarks.  Neither has there been a concerted effort by Republicans as a whole to support tax reform that would equalize the burden of running the government amongst all the citizens, i.e. “Fair Tax”.

3.      Do you support the Keystone energy pipeline as a way to boost American Job Creation, address high energy prices and reduce our dependence on Middle East oil?
a.       Yes.  I support the Keystone pipeline, but it doesn’t help us become energy independent because it too is a source of foreign oil, meaning that when it is completed, our dependence on foreign oil will shift from the OPEC countries to our neighbor to the North, Canada.
b.      As far as I have been informed, Republicans haven’t done anything to shift the subsidies received by the oil companies to programs that would ultimately wean us off of the need to use fossil fuels altogether.  Oil companies obviously make their money from finite sources of energy and should be the forerunners of research in alternate sources of energy so that when the fossil fuels run out, they will be able to stay in business.

4.      The American Action Network reports that in 2011 alone, the Obama administration imposed “$231.4 billion in regulatory burdens and 133 million paperwork burden hours” that threaten small businesses.  Do you support House Republican efforts to eliminate excessive regulation on job creators?
a.       Yes.  The current administration has attempted to reduce the U.S. to a third world country in this fashion.
b.      Government control of the Free Market system has been part of the agenda of every administration since Woodrow Wilson put in place the sixteenth amendment.  Republican administrations have aided and abetted this process in every administration they have controlled as well.  It appears as though the pot is calling the kettle black on this one.

5.      During President Obama’s time in the White House, Washington has racked up the three largest deficits in U.S. history.  Do you agree that out of control government spending harms long-term economic growth?
a.       Yes.  This administration has amassed a record for having deficits with no budget at all.  The only balanced budgets that have happened in my lifetime have been those in which the Social Security Trust Fund has been raided to make it look like the budget was balanced under President Clinton.
b.      Now I ask you, have the Republican administrations over the past 60 years managed to have a real balanced budget in which smoke and mirrors have not been used to make it appear more balanced than it really is?  Obviously not.

6.      Do you support House Republican efforts to cut discretionary government spending back to pre-”stimulus,” pre-bailout levels?
a.       No.  The discretionary spending should be the major portion of the government’s spending.  In order to make that happen, the entitlements or non-discretionary spending; i.e. Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid should be phased out completely.  That would only leave the payment on the National Debt as non-discretionary spending.
b.      Both political parties have continued to perpetuate the “entitlement mentality” because it benefits them politically.  As long as the voting public is beholding to the government for any larges, they will vote for those who give them the most.  This skews the elections in favor of the party that offers the most, which turns us into a welfare state or socialistic country.  Republicans have been as guilty as Democrats except they have been doing it more slowly.

7.      Do you support House Republicans’ ban on earmarks?
a.       Yes.  That would be a good place to start to true the elections.
b.      However, Republicans have been just as guilty as Democrats have for taking advantage of earmarks.  Take Ron Paul for example; he has voted against every appropriations bill that has had earmarks in it, at the same time he has been putting earmarks in the bills that he is sure will pass without his vote.

8.      Do you support a Balanced Budget Amendment to the U.S. Constitution?
a.       Yes.  The only reason is because it appears that politicians don’t have the integrity to propose a balanced budget on their own.
b.      At present this point is mute because Congress hasn’t had a budget in three years, which makes it very hard to balance it.  It appears that within the Balanced Budget amendment there needs to be a clause that says that if Congress can’t produce a budget on time or at a minimum produce a budget before the end of the year, then there should be a mandatory election to replace them in which they cannot be placed on the ballot.

9.      Do you agree that fixing our nations broken tax code will help job creators and make American manufacturers more competitive?
a.       Yes.  However, the only to fix the tax code permanently is to scrap it altogether.  There is no way to “fix” what we currently have.  It is part of the Communist Manifesto to have a “graduated” tax code. 
b.      The only way to make sure that each citizen pays his “fair share” is with a tax on consumption.  That way those who are poor will pay their share by paying the same percentage on their meager purchases as the billionaires pay on their purchases of yachts and other luxury items.  It would also increase the tax base because foreign visitors to our country would have to pay the same tax.

10.  Do you support the GOP’s plan introduced last year to remove government barriers to private-sector jobs—the Plan for America’s Job Creators?
a.       No.  Any plan proposed by the government to create “private-sector” jobs has strings attached to it.  This would place the government in a position to “pick and choose” which jobs would be created and that is unconstitutional.
b.      Republicans should know better than to propose such a plan.

11.  Is the media devoting enough coverage to the nearly 30 jobs bills House Republicans passed in 2011 that remain stuck in the U.S. Senate?
a.       No.  The media has not done its job in the past 50 years.  Main stream media has a liberal (socialistic) agenda and will not report honestly on anything done by the opposition party.
b.      However, I’m sure the Republicans would be just as happy as the Democrats are if the shoe were on the other foot.

12.  Do you agree that fundamental reform is needed to save critical health and retirement programs like Social Security and Medicare from future generations?
a.       No.  These entitlement programs infringe on my responsibility to provide for my family and myself.  These are the very programs that, through their inception and mismanagement, have placed us into the position we are in financially as a nation.  Our ancestors did not need them and we don’t need them now. 
b.      As harsh as it sounds, I would prefer to be responsible for my own health care and perhaps die early because I didn’t manage it well than to provide tax funds for abortions and deprive those yet unborn of an opportunity to have lived.

13.  Do you agree with the Republican position that any entitlement reforms should protect Americans currently 55 or older?
a.       Yes.  This is only because “well-meaning yet unscrupulous” politicians forced the programs on the people. 
b.      The programs should be phased out to allow those who have paid into them to receive a return on their investment.  However, those who have not heavily invested in the programs yet should have the opportunity to secure their own retirement and health care.  With the current tax code, they those who have invested in these programs should be given tax credits up to 10% of what they have invested until they have recuperated their investment.  With a new tax code of taxation on consumption, they should be given a yearly 10% lump sum of their investment until the entire investment is paid back.

14.  Do you support the immediate and total repeal of the ObamaCare health care law?
a.       Yes.  There is nothing more devastating to a country that to have the government in charge of health care for each citizen.
b.      If you can control what healthcare of each individual, there is nothing you can’t get him or her to do.

15.  Do you believe medical malpractice reform to stop junk lawsuits and lower costs should be a priority for healthcare reform legislation?
a.       No.  Just as ObamaCare is unconstitutional, so would any legislation of this nature be unconstitutional.
b.      The states are the ones responsible for the jurisprudence in their state and the federal government has no constitutional right to intervene.

16.  Do you believe that ObambCare’s tax increases, cost hikes and mandates are making it harder for employers to hire and invest?
a.       Yes.  But why ask this question if you want people to answer that they want ObamaCare repealed?
b.      Any time government interferes in the affairs between employer and employee, it is overstepping its constitutional authority.

17.  Do you believe you can receive the same quality health care and accessibility to quality care through a federal government run health care system?
a.       No.  The federal government has no business trying to intervene in the affairs of its citizens in any regard.
b.      The Federal Government’s job is to intervene in international cases and to prevent states from abusing each other in the area of commerce.  Nothing not specifically authorized in the Constitution under Article 1 Section 8 is the responsibility of the Federal Government.

18.  Do you support the House-passed No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act to permanently ban taxpayer funding for abortions across all federal programs?
a.       Yes.  Funding for taking the life from an unborn child is totally egocentric.  It says that one who is living is more important that one who hasn’t had the opportunity to do so yet.  The unborn are totally innocent of any wrong doing yet they are being exterminated by those who think their life is more important.
b.      Doesn’t government have the responsibility to protect “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”?  Under the Declaration of Independence, don’t the people have the responsibility to replace any government that doesn’t protect those rights?

19.  Do you support allowing parents to send their children to the school of their choice be it public, parochial, or private?
a.       Yes.  Again, there is no provision for any government intervention in education.
b.      Wasn’t our education system better when the states had to compete for citizens?  Wasn’t part of that competition the schools that were offered in those states?  Let the states compete for a larger tax base by providing better schooling for the children.  “No Child Left Behind” means that those who excel have to be slowed down to allow those with lesser abilities to reach a passing level (many of whom have learned to game the system and just wait until they are passed to a higher grade out of necessity).

20.  Has the Obama Administration done enough to counter Iran’s drive to acquire a nuclear weapon?
a.       No.  There have been so many loopholes in the sanctions that have been placed on Iran that they have been able to stay afloat in spite of them.
b.      Have we forgotten that the country is run by an Ayatollah of the Muslim faith?  Does anyone in our current administration (many of whom are also Muslims) realize that Iran doesn’t have to tell the truth to the American government because we are considered “infidels” and the Quran states that it’s proper for Muslims to lie to infidels?

21.  Is stopping illegal immigration and border violence a matter of national security?
a.       Yes.  This administration has ignored existing laws to increase the Latino voting bloc.
b.      Remember, agents Ramos and Campean went to jail under President Bush.  He desire for the Latino vote in his last election.  They were guilty of something that in any other case would be considered worth a letter of reprimand, not prison time.  So who is guilty of not enforcing the border and immigration laws?

22.  Are you committed to helping ensure that in 2012, Republicans retain a majority in the House so no matter who wins the White House, conservatives have a voice in Washington D.C.?
a.       Yes.  I will support Republican candidates for Congress and the Senate.
b.      My support for Republicans is not so much because they are Republicans, but because it will slow the process toward socialism some.  Maybe the Republican Party will see the light and forsake ALL their tendencies toward socialism by the next election.

23.  Do you believe the Republican House Majority elected in 2010 is doing a good job fighting on your behalf for policies that help create jobs?
a.       Yes.  To the best of their abilities and understanding, Republicans are fighting for jobs.
b.      The government’s job is to get out of the way and let the private sector grow and supply the jobs.  Haven’t you been listening to your own presidential candidate?

An additional question:

24.  Do you believe that the Republican House should have impeached the President immediately after they took office on grounds of his violation of his oath of office because of his subversion of the Constitution with his Executive Orders?
a.       Yes.  Why wasn’t it done and what makes you think that the American public should have confidence in Congress that can’t even present an impeachment indictment for a president that is obviously subverting the Constitution?

Here comes the real reason for the survey.  No, I will not donate to any Republican cause.  If I choose, I will support specific candidates but not the party as a whole.  There is NO party in this country that represents a true return to the Constitution and its strict construction ideology. 

I am incensed that your party thinks I’m so dumb that I would answer these questions just the way the party wants me to.  And that, I would donate to any party that thinks their members are so gullible as to blindly answer these questions and then throw money behind the group without knowing specifically what that money is being used for.  Just because someone tacks a party name to their own, doesn’t mean that they support the parties views.

Sincerely,


William L. Pressgrove

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

What's Wrong With Our Education System?
     There is nothing wrong with the education system...that can't be fixed by looking at the real problem instead of throwing more and more money at the problem.  Money is not the solution to the problem as many politicians would like you to believe.  Firing all the teachers and administrators isn't the answer either.
     The problem doesn't even start in the schools as many would have you believe.  The problem starts with the progressive idea that everything should be free.  States set up the progressive "mandatory attendance" laws and that forces all the youth of our country to attend school whether they want to or not.  Those who don't want to end up making problem in the classroom and on the school campus, disrupting the education of those who want to attend and learn.  Teachers and administrators spend more time dealing with inappropriate behavior than they do teaching.
     Parents think that the teachers and administrators should do two things.  1) They should make their kids learn, and 2) they should make their kids behave.  Now where does that attitude come from?  It comes from the fact that they have been brainwashed into the "entitlement mentality".  They feel that because the government takes care of their every need, that the school should do the same for their children, after all the government program states, "No Child Left Behind."  All I have to say about this attitude is that "you can take a horse to water, but you can't make him drink."
     I worked in two different school districts along the Texas/Mexican border for 12 years and I must say that I was sadly disappointed in the state of affairs in those two school districts.  In one there were candy and soda machines in the lobby and the students would flock to them between classes.  However, the Student Handbook prohibited the students from eating in the hallways or classrooms.  With a five minute passing period from one class to the next, how would it be possible for the 800 students to get to the machines, eat their sweets, and get to class on time?  The answer is they didn't.  If they didn't get their confectionary fix within the alloted five minutes, they would make some excuse to leave the room during class (the most common was that they had to go to the bathroom) and go purchase their candy and eat it (in the hallway) as they were going back to class.
     I approached the principal with the problem and pointed out that we were forcing the students to make a decision as to whether to violate the rules by getting candy and eating it in the hallways or in the classroom, or go hungry or get out of class to get it later.  I pointed out what the Student Handbook rules were, and that by allowing this kind of behavior we were teaching the students to be juvenile delinquents.  They were tempted to break the rules by the fact that the candy machines were available (except when it competed with the school lunch program, when they were shut off then).  Her answer was, "Well we make a lot of money off those machines."
     So, in this school district, teaching good moral character took a back seat to making money off of the machines. Doesn't that have something to do with where the priorities of the school district were?  I received the same response from the acting Superintendent of Schools, so I guess money was more important than morals there.
     My experience at the other school stemmed from the fact that the students were under the impression that the teacher was responsible for passing them.  They had the idea that if the teacher failed too many of them, they would be fired, so the students didn't have to do anything to earn a passing grade, the teacher would be forced to give it to them.  Well the administration proved them right.  During the first semester of the 2009-2010 school year 47% of my students refused to even turn in any homework (a 20 minute assignment each day and this while the principal admitted that the other teachers weren't giving homework.)  The district policy was that the students be graded 60% on their performance and 40% on assessments.  So when the students didn't turn in their assignments, they lost 60% of their grade and they needed 70% to pass.  A majority of these same students were failing up to 4 classes.
     After the end of the semester the Principal called me into his office and dressed me down for having such a high failure rate (like I deliberately failed these students).  He wouldn't listen to any argument for the reason they were failing.  He didn't want to hear how many other classes they were failing, he just told me that I had to do something different so that they could pass the class.  The next year I was moved to another school (the Freshman Campus where the first semester 300 of 700 students failed 4 or more classes for the semester) and told that the only reason I was still teaching was because I had another two years on my contract.
     This incident prompted me to go to the Junior College that serviced my high school and two others to ask for a data work-up on the number of students coming straight out of high school that needed "developmental education" (classes in any combination of reading, writing, or math) before they could start receiving credits at the junior college.  The results were that between 2004 and 2009 as high as 65% of the students entering directly from high school needed developmental education in one or some combination of all three areas (most needed training in at least 2 of the subjects).
     That means that even though these students were receiving their diploma from high school, they weren't educated well enough to continue their basic education.  So do you think they were prepared to step into a job somewhere that was more than the basic menial labor position?
     The parents of each graduate class were so proud of their graduating senior(s).  They were content that their student(s) had received that piece of paper that said they were educated enough to either continue on to college or that they were prepared to step into the workforce and be viable members of society even though they couldn't read, write, or do the basic math that it takes to do either.
     So who is at fault?  Our society is.  We have allowed our government to force us into school whether or not we want to go.  We have accepted the bare minimum to be our standard of excellence.  We have allowed the government to threaten parents and schools with law suits if it perceived that the discipline was not what they agreed with so that both parents and school teachers/administrators are afraid to administer the discipline needed to procure for society a generation that is self-disciplined and educated.
     So who is to blame?  The deliberate degeneration of a law abiding citizenry by the progressives in government, that's who.  A majority of Americans have become so dependent on the government that they will do what ever it takes to keep the government assistance coming.  They have become lawless and dependent.  Their progeny has grown up expecting the same so why should they work either at a job or at school for what they receive?
     The only way this trend will change is for us to return to the work ethic that this country once had.  If you will remember, even though there had been many recessions before the "Great Depression" this country was on its way up the ladder of success.  Even though some failed and had to start over again, most were succeeding and the country was progressing economically.  It wasn't until the government intervention started (with farm subsidies and the like) that the country's economic progress started slowing down.  Yes, it looked like we were progressing through the world wars, but that was because we were all working together (half the country wasn't living on the dole).  Now we have the progressives in power who are doing their utmost to "divide and conquer" by giving to the "most" by taking away from the "rest."
     The Progressives in power would like nothing more than to see the chasm between those that give and those that receive develop into a violent altercation.  My fear is that either way it will come to that.  If those who pay stop paying, the government will take it or tell the receivers that the payers stopped paying and have them "take it out of the payer's hide".  On the other hand, if the payers continue being extorted until they have nothing left to take and then the receivers will riot because they aren't receiving any more.
     The only way for those who have been successful and have a work ethic to overcome the odds is for us to make sure every individual that is being exploited and those who think this exploitation is wrong gets out and votes to overturn and reverse what has been done that takes away so much of our free choice in our lives.