Saturday, May 23, 2009

The Principles of Liberty (Twenty-five)

By William Pressgrove

“‘Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations—entangling alliances with none.’” (The 5000 Year Leap, W. Cleon Skousen p. 267)

One of the things I’m most sure of is that Washington and Jefferson were right when they warned America about “entangling alliances.” The warning was not just for government; however, it was for our businesses and entrepreneurs as well. World War I wasn’t a “world” war until the major powers came to the aid of their smaller “allies” and then the super powers jumped in to assist their allies the major powers.

The producers in our country helped it along by assisting our allies with weapons that weren’t being supplied to the opposition. The opposition, in order to protect themselves, attacked the supply ships that were bringing those weapons to the allies and so on until American Troops ended up in the middle of the fray in Europe.

World War II essentially began because of economics in Europe. Germany was in bad shape trying to pay back the war debt from WWI. That gave Hitler the opportunity that he needed to “talk” Germany into the expansion that eventually fueled WWII. However, this time the provocation that caused America to enter the war was that of an expanding Japanese empire (again another entangling alliance this time with Hitler and Mussolini). If you take a close look at it Japan was looking for raw materials they needed to boost their economy. The U.S. stood in the way of that expansion so they attacked us.

Today however, we have more entangling alliances than we have ever had. Government has directly opposed this sage advice by establishing “most favored trade” status with countries like China. Doing so means that other countries are slighted and their economies affected. Washington put it this way:

“In the execution of such a plan [of how to treat other nations] nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations and passionate attachments for others should be excluded, and that in place of them just and amicable feelings toward all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges toward another an habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and interest.” (Fitzpatrick, Writings of George Washington, 35:231 as quoted in The 5000 Year Leap, W. Cleon Skousen, p.269)

As we can see, when we walk through the aisles of almost any department store, most of the items for sale are made in some other country (at Walmart it is difficult to find items made in the USA, most are made in China). This kind of “alliance” has led us to a dependency on foreign goods because our manufacturing has moved overseas.

Some may say we need to get out of the world market and go back to making everything right hear which would equate to the isolationism that Skousen talks about. That would only serve as an incubator for animosity against the U.S. by other countries. We can see how that has been detrimental to balance by looking at North Korea today. They have maintained their isolationism and because of it, and the communistic philosophy of its leaders, it has proven to be an economy killer.

The idea the Founding Fathers had was to keep our noses out of the political affairs of other countries at the same time maintain an open economic intercourse with all nations. That is what they termed separatism.

As it is, we have become so entangled in world affairs that those in power feel that, just like our; auto, insurance, and banking industries, there are countries that are just too big and too “important to fail.” So we buy their friendship with our “liberal” handout programs called “foreign aid” so that they can continue their “pursuit of happiness” at the peril of our own.

I feel as Washington did that this country was founded with the aid of Divine Providence and that He sustains all those who worship Him. Washington summed it up well when he said:

“Observe good faith and justice toward all nations. Cultivate peace and harmony with all. Religion and morality enjoin this conduct; and can it be that good policy does not equally enjoin it? It will be worthy of a free, enlightened, and, at no distant period, a great nation to give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a people always guided by an exalted justice and benevolence.” (Ibid.)

One of the things I perceive more and more from our society, in its search for “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” is that it tends to try to force people to have it. Our country as well has engaged in forcing other countries into “democracy” when we should be leaving well enough alone and providing the best example of a democratic republic. In our own country, we have courts ordering 13 year-olds to undergo chemotherapy for cancer when they have chosen not to receive it. Does the state own that individual? Will the state be eternally damaged if the young man chooses an alternative treatment and passes away from it? This same philosophy is what causes us to enter into “entangling alliances” with other countries whether those allinaces are political or economic (NAFTA for example).