Friday, March 20, 2009

Principles of Liberty (Sixteen)

Principles of Liberty (Sixteen)

By William Pressgrove

“The government should be separated into three branches—Legislative, Executive, and Judicial.” (The 5000 Year Leap, W. Cleon Skousen p. 194)

Today, any time the President wants a law enacted he can make an “Executive Order.” That order has the weight of law (unless Congress acts within a specified amount of time to vote against it). The last time I checked, that maneuver circumvents the Constitutional process of making laws through the legislature. By the same token, the Supreme Court rules on a case and low and behold the law is changed. The last time I checked, that is called “legislating from the bench.”

So, without going into the history of Polybius and the Baron Charles de Montesquieu and how they influenced the Founding Fathers, it appears that the principle of separation of powers was to ensure that no one individual or group could gain control of all of the power in the government. It appears that this ideology has taken a back seat to a power struggle between the three branches of government. The executive wants to not only execute the law but to legislate it as well. The judicial not only wants to adjudicate the law, but to fashion laws that reflect their ideology from what they adjudicate. No, the legislative branch, instead of keeping an eye on the legislative ambitions of the other two, is more interested in the political power of partisan politics. They only want to do two things. First, they want their party to be in control, and second, to make sure they remain in office as long as they possibly can.

There are many legal uses of executive orders, but not all presidents have operated within the guidelines of what is legal. When the president acts by executive order to further a politically motivated policy it can become law if there is no opposition to it by Congress. Likewise, if no case involving the executive order is brought before the Supreme Court to be adjudicated it can remain as law. Therefore, the executive can act as, not only the executor or the law, but also legislator from the “Oval Office.”

It is not as easy to see how the Supreme Court makes law, but a prime example is the Roe v. Wade case in which the Supreme Court establishes by its ruling when life begins which opened the way for federally funded abortions. The courts in California have legislated from the bench to overturn laws in California thus allowing same-sex marriages which the citizens of California countered with Proposition 8 that established the definition of marriage in the State Constitution. Those opposed to the proposition have resorted to the court to overturn this amendment with the argument that the amendment is unconstitutional. This will be a case to keep an eye on.

With what is going on in this country right now we need to be reminded and to remind each other of this separation of powers. We need to remain involved in the affairs of our national government by writing frequently to our Congressmen and Representatives with our opinions on the legislation that is being proposed by Congress, Executive Orders that legislate, and rulings from the bench of the Supreme Court that tend to limit our rights to live, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.